Dukha Mimamsa: Depth of Suffering ::
The Bhagavad Gita places much stress on the need for maintaining an
equanimity of mind under both adverse or favorable circumstances
(Bhagavad Gita: 6.7; 12.18 and 14.25). However, this is easier said than
done. In the Shrimad Bhagavata Purana, that relishable text overflowing
with the nectar of sweet words fallen from Krishna’s delicious lips,
the lord says in unambiguous terms:
"Whether reproached or insulted, ridiculed or belittled, beaten or
bound by ropes, or deprived of one’s means of livelihood, spat or
urinated upon by the wicked - when one’s foundations are shaken in this
manner, one should try to redeem oneself by recourse to reason."
In response to this instruction, Krishna’s great devotee and friend Uddhava queried:
"Such outrages against oneself by the wicked are the most difficult to
bear because our nature to respond against any such mistreatment is very
powerful and hard to resist. Therefore, do explain to me how I can
understand and realize the exalted spiritual state you are talking
about."
(Shrimad Bhagavata Purana 11.22.57 - 60).
:: Dukha Mimamsa: Depth of Suffering ::
The Bhagavad Gita places much stress on the need for maintaining an
equanimity of mind under both adverse or favorable circumstances
(Bhagavad Gita: 6.7; 12.18 and 14.25). However, this is easier said than
done. In the Shrimad Bhagavata Purana, that relishable text overflowing
with the nectar of sweet words fallen from Krishna’s delicious lips,
the lord says in unambiguous terms:
"Whether
reproached or insulted, ridiculed or belittled, beaten or bound by
ropes, or deprived of one’s means of livelihood, spat or urinated upon
by the wicked - when one’s foundations are shaken in this manner, one
should try to redeem oneself by recourse to reason."
In response to this instruction, Krishna’s great devotee and friend Uddhava queried:
"Such outrages against oneself by the wicked are the most difficult to
bear because our nature to respond against any such mistreatment is very
powerful and hard to resist. Therefore, do explain to me how I can
understand and realize the exalted spiritual state you are talking
about."
(Shrimad Bhagavata Purana 11.22.57 - 60).
In his inimitable charming style, Krishna then proceeds to narrate a
story, embedded within which is a creative way to realize the equitable
state of mind (samata) outlined above.
Long long
ago, in the ancient city of Ujjain there lived a brahmin, who was
however a brahmin in name only. By resorting to various businesses, he
had amassed a huge wealth. He was an extreme miser, never spending a
penny on himself, or on any of his family and friends. Due to his
extreme temperament, all near and dear ones were unsympathetic, if not
downright hostile towards him.
It was not long
before such an unnatural state of affairs came to an end, and all his
wealth, earned with much hard work, and stored with an even greater
effort, came to naught in front of his very own eyes. Some of it was
plundered by his near and dear ones, part of it was stolen by thieves,
some was confisticated by the government and the rest was ruined by
natural causes such as fire etc. Thus was lost his entire wealth, which
he had never made use of for his personal enjoyment nor for charity.
The Brahmins’ Mental State After Losing Everything:
Reduced to this pitiable condition, a very great despondency swept over
the brahmin. As he began brooding over his lot, tears choked his throat
and as a result he felt an almost unbearable anxiety. Suddenly however,
the same despondency became the cause of a strange contended happiness
which he felt seeping through his body, and a strong feeling of
renunciation came over him and he said to himself:
"Alas! I tormented myself uselessly by working so hard for accumulating
wealth which was used neither for religious merit (dharma), nor for
enjoyment. Truly is it said that misers always have to suffer - in this
world they burn with anxiety for earning and safeguarding their money
and after death they go to hell because of neglecting dharma during
their lifetime."
"Indeed, first earning money, and
then the ambition to increase it, keeping it safe, or spending it – all
these involve constant hard work, fear, and anxiety. Brothers, wife,
parents, all near and dear ones, who seem bound to us with love, they
all become estranged within no time over a single penny."
"Having achieved this human birth, which is coveted even by the gods,
those who disrespect it (as I had done), they destroy but their own
highest self-interest. This human body is a gateway to both heaven and
final liberation (Moksha). Which intelligent person would let go of this
opportunity and rather involve himself in the business of money, the
abode of all calamities. I have fallen from my supreme duty and
carelessly squandered away my life, money and strength, which if
properly utilized could have become doorways to liberation. I do not
understand why even intelligent people allow themselves to be troubled
with so much futile endeavors for acquisition of wealth? Certainly this
world is being deluded by an unknown maya."
"This
human body is in the constant vile grip of death. Hence what purpose
could be served by money itself, or those who give money, pleasure or
those who give pleasure? What is to be gained by performing karma which
but leads to perpetual rebirth in the never ending cycle of birth and
death? However, there is no doubt that today the great Lord Hari is
immensely pleased with me for he has brought me to this miserable
condition which has thus sowed in me the seed of discontentment, helping
me to achieve vairagya, the disenchantment with all things material,
which is but the boat to cross over the ocean of worldly miseries."
"I have luckily been reduced to this state, and with whatever time now
remains of my life, I will perform austerities and subsist only on bare
necessities."
Having resolved his mind thus, the brahmin became silent and set out to wander freely in this world as an unkempt beggar.
What Happened Next?
Wherever that old brahmin, now in tatters, would go, wicked people
would insult him terribly. Some would snatch away the stick he was
supporting himself on, while others would take away his begging bowl.
Someone would make away with his Rudraksha Mala even as others would
throw away his loin cloth. If that were not enough many would give him
objects only to snatch them back. When the old man would sit on the
riverbank to partake the meager alms he had collected, rowdy individuals
would even go to the extent of spitting, urinating, or even breaking
wind on him. They would try and force the silent monk to speak, and when
he would not do so, they would hit him.
Often some
miscreants would call him a thief and tie him up with ropes, some would
call him a hypocrite, recalling his earlier days and insinuate that
having been thrown out of the house by his wife and children, he had now
made religion his new business.
The brahmin beggar would however patiently bear it all. He was thus exposed to the following three torments:
1). Adhyatmic: Physical suffering having source in one’s own body e.g. fever etc.
2). Adhidaivik: Suffering on account of the gods: Heat, cold, rains etc.
3). Adhibhautik: Suffering imposed by other living in form of humiliation etc.
Although base people tried constantly hard to shake his determination,
he remained steadfast on his spiritual platform. He took each and every
bit of suffering in his stride, reconciling himself with each of them,
thoroughly working out the nature of "suffering", expressing his
thoughts in the following words:
"My joys or sorrows
are not due to these people, nor the gods, nor my body, not the
planets, nor my karma or kala (time). The scriptures declare the mind
alone to be the cause of both of these and indeed it is the mind alone
which perpetuates the repeated cycle of birth and death. The mind is
very powerful, and actuates the mental states which then evolve into the
various kinds of karma leading to the various states of existence
according to the "quality" of the karma. Mind is the initiator of all
activity. Therefore, the supreme goal of all spiritual enterprises,
whether it be charity, practice of one’s duties, yoga, study of the
Vedas, celibacy or fasting, is the subjugation of the mind."
"In fact, one whose mind is peace with itself, what is he to gain by
meritorious activities like charity etc? On the other hand one whose
mind is still uncontrolled, even though he may be performing these
meritorious deeds, has still not gained anything by them. All sense
organs are under the sway of the mind, however, the mind is under the
control of none of these. This mind is the strongest of the strongest,
and one who is able to bring it under control is truly the god of gods
(deva-deva)."
"An undisciplined mind is the greatest
of all enemies. Its attack is almost unbearable. Not only does it
torment the body, but also afflicts the softer portions (like the heart)
of our inner being. It is difficult to defeat the mind. However, this
is the first enemy man should try and win over; but what happens is that
man does not try to win over his own mind rather he tries to establish
blame for his good/bad situation on extraneous circumstances or people.
If I see that the people who give me charity are the cause of my
happiness and those who harass me are the cause of my distress then I am
merely absorbed in the bodily concept of life and am able to scrape
only the surface of life rather than grasp its ultimate core."
The beggar then set out to systematically outline each of the factors
which logically could be said to have been the cause behind his
suffering, and through a thorough analysis showed why none of these
could eventually be the ultimate cause of his distress.
1). Other Human Beings:
The brahmin said: "If we hold other human beings responsible for our
happiness or distress, then how does it affect out True Self (atman)
which is immaterial, while both the perpetrator and the sufferer are but
bodies made of the same dust. If ever a man bites his own tongue with
his teeth, then on whom would he lay the blame for the pain he would
experience?"
The Self remains beyond both the body
and the mind. This Self neither fattens with the body nor shares the joy
or sorrows of the mind. The outside world can only affect the body and
the mind and never the Self. When the body of a person is garlanded his
mind is elated, and when his form is kicked, it is the mind again which
rebels. The Self is just the witness to his insult and joy.
All physical bodies are made up of the same five elements – empty space
(akasha), air, fire, water and earth. Inside all physical bodies, it is
the same divine consciousness inhabiting them as the ultimate Self.
What then is the difference between any two of us? When people honor or
dishonor each other, it is only modifications of the same earth honoring
or dishonoring each other. In the fifth canto of the Shrimad Bhagavat
Purana, there occurs the story of the great saint "Jada Bharata", on
whose name incidentally, the name Bharata was given to the country today
known as India.
Once it so happened that Jada
Bharata was compelled by a king to become his palanquin bearer. The
saint, not used to such a job, stumbled, and was chastised for giving a
severe jolt to the king. The great one answered: "One clod of mud is on
top of another. One calls himself a palanquin carrier and the other a
king. However, both are only mud in essence, with no difference
whatsoever. Knowing this, the wise man remains unaffected."
The pain of the tongue bit by the teeth is my pain, and the aggression
of the teeth is equally mine. For I regard both the teeth and tongue as
"me" alone. Similarly, the one who insults and the one who is insulted
are both expressions, manifestations or conditioning of the same Self,
as the Self in me is the Self in all. Then who can insult who, and why
should one react or suffer? All suffering lies in the sense of otherness
– that "another" has hurt me. Not knowing that the lord was the Self in
him, Shishupal kept fighting with Shri Krishna. When he died, the light
that emerged from his body merged into the lord. Not realizing the one
Self in all we too fight with ourselves all our lives.
2) Gods as the Cause of our Suffering or Happiness:
In Indian Philosophy, all individual aspects of the human body
(adhyatmik) and the various phenomenal forces (adhidaivik) are but one
and the same. Therefore, according to the Upanishads, the sight in the
eyes, and the power of the sun are in essence one. Similarly, Indra is
the ruler of heaven and also at the same time the presiding deity of our
hands, and Agni the deity of our mouth. Therefore, when the hand slaps
the mouth, it is Indra doing so to Agni. Then what? Suppose then the
mouth bites the hand. How does this all affect the one formless Self
beyond the body? Also, when the same gods are present in each of the
differently formed bodies, it is but the same set of deities acting on
each other, since there is no "other", who can be held responsible for
what?
3). Can the Planets (Astrological) be the Cause?
The Planets cannot be the ultimate cause of our sukha (happiness) or
dukha (suffering) because they affect only that which is born and
subject to modification. However, the Self is unborn and therefore there
is no question of it being under the influence of the planets at all.
4). Are Our Actions (Karma) behind Sukha and Dukha?
Before saying that our actions are the cause of our joys and sorrows,
we need to understand that any action is possible only by a combination
of the inert and the conscious. The body is inert and the Self is
conscious.
The doer of action (karta), alone can
become the enjoyer of its results (bhokta). In addition, action can
modify the object of action and also the one who prompts the action. The
Self is neither the karta, nor the prompter (which is perhaps the mind)
nor the object of action, and hence is unaffected by them. The Self is
the actionless subject which witnesses all actions.
The inert by itself cannot act. Consciousness also cannot act without a
body, instruments etc. It is therefore only with combination of the
inert and the sentient that action is possible. Such a combination is
however impossible since the inert and the conscious are of opposite
nature, like light and darkness. Hence, when karma itself has no
ultimate basis in either the body or the soul, then where is the
question of a non-existent thing causing either joy or sorrow.
5). Is Time (Kala) Responsible for the Pain and Pleasure We Experience?
In the Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna says:
"I am (of the nature of) Kala" (10.30)
Time or kala can be experienced as the present alone, and the present
moment, down to the microsecond, can be divided and subdivided till time
itself disappears and only the Self, the witnessing Presence alone
remains. Then how can time which is of the essence of the Self itself,
be the cause of either suffering or joy. A flame cannot be tormented by
its own heat, nor can ice be affected by its own coolness.
Conclusion:
The material body is dull matter and by itself cannot experience
anything, whether it be happiness or distress. The Spirit Soul (Self) is
however pure consciousness and completely transcendental, and therefore
one should fix one’s mind on the transcendental lord who is beyond joy
and sorrow. It is only when the transcendental consciousness,
conditioned by the mind, is identified with dull matter that the living
entity imagines that he or she is enjoying or suffering in the material
world.
However, this transformation from the body to
the Soul requires a radical shift in our thought process, and by
narrating the story of the brahmin mendicant, Krishna shows just how a
severe crisis or an extreme moment of suffering in our life can give us a
highly creative impetus, propelling us on to the path of
self-realization.